Experiences With Google Analytics »
Hi there. Tracking visitors in your site is very important for creating a succesful website.
Google recently launched Google Analytics, a free tool for reviewing your site’s statistics. As a Google Adwords user I’ve been using Google Analytics during the last weeks and really like how the Google boys have improved the product (based in Urchin, company adquired by Google some time ago) .
Google Analytics have had so much demand that they had to stop accepting more users.
Today I accessed my account and it was enabled for 5 profiles, so I started adding some of my other domains and I noticed something that I think wasn’t there before, a little confusion about the position of the Javascript code.
Some weeks ago when I created the profile for ventanazul.com I read:
Please verify that the tracking code is installed correctly by viewing your page source. The code should appear between the head and /head tags, and should follow after any meta tags in that section.
Ok, I did it that way and my reports started working some hours later.
Today I’m reading:
Copy and paste the code segment into the bottom of your content, immediately before the /body tag (the one at the bottom) of each page you are planning to track.
The funny thing is that both alternatives are currently appearing in Google Analytics help pages, I think putting the code at the bottom of the page is the right way, let’s imagine a visitor entering a page and leaving before the page finishes loading, with Google’s code in the head this user could be considered in the reports. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
I’ve also noted a big difference in the number of visits between Webalizer, Awstats and Google Analytics, the first two show almost 10 times more visits than Google, does anybody know how each one is defining one visit?
Comparing the performance of some of my sites in Google Analytics is going to be really interesting, specially when adding some Adwords campaign to the mix. What do you think?
En: SEO / SEM | Por: Alexis | @ 8:03 pm Comentarios (3)






